<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Marketing Technology Blog - Latest Comments in links for 2007-02-24</title><link>http://marketingtechnologyblog.disqus.com/</link><description>Leveraging new media and technology in marketing for increased business results.</description><atom:link href="https://marketingtechnologyblog.disqus.com/links_for_2007_02_24/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 25 Feb 2007 12:04:49 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: links for 2007-02-24</title><link>http://marketingtechblog.com/2007/02/24/links-for-2007-02-24/#comment-11018166</link><description>&lt;p&gt;They could really use some UI help!  The tools are incredible, they just need a good brand and a UI.  I think a $500 to $2k investment would gain them a ton of exposure.  It's hard to take an Internet company serious who doesn't appreciate the aesthetics of a great UI or adoption of the latest technologies.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Douglas Karr</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 25 Feb 2007 12:04:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: links for 2007-02-24</title><link>http://marketingtechblog.com/2007/02/24/links-for-2007-02-24/#comment-11018165</link><description>&lt;p&gt;...that page for webmasters is truly, truly, &lt;i&gt;truly&lt;/i&gt; the most, ehem, not-designed page I have come accross since all laptops came with colour screens. Hey, I dare say my very fist homepage in 1997 looked better than that ;)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Martin</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 25 Feb 2007 10:09:01 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>